Dark money spending in Oklahoma elections has steadily increased over the past decade, with no end in sight for the upcoming 2026 election cycle. 

Oklahoma lawmakers will gather this week to get a better grasp on the issue and possible legislative solutions.

Rep. Meloyde Blancett, D-Tulsa, will lead an interim study on the use of dark money in Oklahoma politics this morning, Monday, Oct. 13, from 9:30 to 11:30 a.m. To view a livestream or recording of the meeting, click here

Oklahoma Watch has reported extensively on the proliferation of dark money spending. In the months leading up to the June 2024 primary election, outside groups spent almost $3 million to influence Oklahoma voters, eclipsing the amount spent by candidates. Most of these groups did not share donor information. 

In April 2024, Gov. Kevin Stitt’s Task Force on Campaign Finance and Election Threats recommended several changes to curtail dark money spending, including allowing candidates to accept unlimited donations from individuals and political parties. Under current ethics rules, donations are capped at $3,500 per election. 

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. FEC opened the floodgates for politically involved nonprofits to spend unlimited amounts of money on elections, so long as they don’t coordinate with campaigns. Several researchers have tied the decision to a rise in political polarization and increased influence of wealthy donors and special interest groups. 

While Oklahoma doesn’t have the authority to stop the spending, other states have passed transparency laws requiring the organizations to report their donors. In 2022, 72% of Arizona voters enacted the Voter’s Right to Know Act, which requires organizations that spend more than $50,000 in statewide elections to report the original source of donations exceeding $5,000. A challenge to the law is pending in the Arizona Supreme Court. 

Feel free to reach me at Kross@Oklahomawatch.org with thoughts, questions or story ideas. 

— Keaton Ross

Recommended Reading

  • High court strikes down Oklahoma business courts: The Oklahoma Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the Legislature overstepped its constitutional bounds by trying to establish business courts with unelected judges. Critics of Senate Bill 632 argued it would have circumvented judicial oversight and allowed political control over special court appointments. [Oklahoma Voice]
  • Former Oklahoma Senate leader sues state for negligence in traffic accident that injured son: Ex-Senate President Pro Tem Greg Treat filed a lawsuit against the Oklahoma Highway Patrol and Canadian County, alleging they mishandled a traffic stop incident that left his son critically injured. The suit claims delayed medical attention and procedural failures contributed to worsening his son’s injuries. [KOSU]
  • House District 35 vacant seat draws six candidates: Five Republicans and a Democrat are vying to replace Rep. Ty Burns, who resigned in August following a domestic abuse conviction. A GOP primary election is scheduled for Dec. 10, and if no candidate wins outright, a runoff will be held Jan. 10. The general election will be held Feb. 10. [NonDoc]

Help Us Make a Difference

Oklahoma needs high-quality investigative journalism. That is our mission at Oklahoma Watch. We produce stories that hold government and public officials accountable and that make transparent what some prefer to keep secret. We depend on financial support from readers like you to sustain our coverage. Help us make a difference.


Support our publication

Every day we strive to produce journalism that matters — stories that strengthen accountability and transparency, provide value and resonate with readers like you.

This work is essential to a better-informed community and a healthy democracy. But it isn’t possible without your support.

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.